There are bound to be comprehensive answers to this question. Many hidden or open reasons, from the disclosures that bother them to preventing something on a received sensation, can lead to the fact that the privy/privacy’s fever rises and becomes convulsive. Here we will try to make a brief assessment of the general content of the subject.
While evaluating the privy/privacy structure of the community, which is one of the formations in which illegal works are concentrated today, it would be appropriate to deal with it section by section. As of the point reached, it is one of the known facts that the segment forming the base of the congregation is unaware of the fact that the “privy/privacy imams” carry out illegal activities.
If the situation of this layer of people and the situation of the people who do illegal acts are evaluated by considering the same criteria, the members of the congregation who insist on taking their noses should not be evaluated together with those who have been in a privy/privacy structure but who said “I regret” after being aware of the facts and took refuge in our state. Otherwise, it will be inevitable that a strangeness will emerge, which is difficult to understand by the public and exactly the kind that the privy/privacy organization would like. So what could be the consequences of this grotesque? This situation will lead to the delay of the public in the first place to learn the inner side of the incident and the privy/privacy structure organization to continue its influence on this layer of people, which no one would want.
At this point, close to a million people have been investigated, and many of them had to meet the cold face of the courthouse. It should be noted that many of these people supported this formation with the idea of contributing to the charity movement. Because what kind of action can a person who is a housewife and tradesman in a remote corner of Anatolia do in the sense of organized crime? It has been and will be a constructive approach to open a door for these people and say, “here you go, save yourself”.
Sometimes, the questions that people within this scope face can be such that they do not tell even if they know something. A person who is asked the questions why did you go to the chat, why did you give a scholarship, why did you stay in the community houses, can say that it has been a crime for a long time to go to the chat and give students a lesson and can take himself under protection and withdraw.
Saying to these people, “look, this incident has a poisonous effect on the society, it has a dynamite side to the unity of the nation and the health of the state, and you may have supported this work knowingly or unknowingly” and the elimination of some grievances that the organization uses as a basis for itself, the citizens in this part of the country, which may be against the state. It may be an appropriate approach in order to prevent blurred vision and ensure public peace. Otherwise, it will be impossible to tell the people in this layer about the crimes committed in the privy/privacy unıts.
On the other hand, our state extends its hand under the name of active repentance to those who have been in privy/privacy units that have become the focus of attempts to produce harm rather than benefit to the society we mentioned above and strives to prevent waste of lives in dead-end streets.
These days, the rhetoric of incorrigible congregationalists on social media channels, which threatens those who have made effective remorse, reveals that the path taken is correct. We think that ways and methods that will allow such an approach to be used more effectively should be explored and its scope should be further expanded for those who want to benefit from it.
An incorrigible mob claims that those who have made effective remorse said out of nowhere, “I’m a terrorist, forgive me”. This discourse is nothing but trying to mislead people by making fallacy(mugalata). Those who have made effective remorse do not say “I am a terrorist”, on the contrary, they say “I am not a terrorist, but this sinister nature made me this way, I seek refuge in my state, I can’t see any other way out”.
If your path, which you entered because there is good in this business or there is goodness, is ruled by a leader who can make evaluations detached from reality, saying that so many people died in the battle of Uhud for the night that 250 of our citizens were martyred, it means that salt stinks there. Even this small – but very meaningful – example is one of the proofs of how people who trust themselves and those around them and set their minds on the road are dragged into a life disconnected from reality, since they are known and evaluated as people of consultation.
How can there be any other way of salvation from the dark corridors that the privy/privacy structure puts people into the light with the veil? You listen to the voice of your conscience and there are various situations where you are uncomfortable, what will you do? You want to come clean, look ahead, how will you act? Today, there is no answer to these questions by the notables of the congregation.
That’s why, no matter what you say, they always use words like “These are not topics to talk about now, let’s not duplicate the calamity, but they did this to us, but they also did that”. This situation is similar to the air of the team players who are exhausted from conceding a goal in a match, even if the ball is not in my field, send it to wherever you can send it. However, in the final case, it is the citizens who can be called poor citizens, whom those who say this discourse have thrown into the fire, suffer the scourge.
When asked why these things happened to us, trying to move forward by always putting the blame on someone else is the organizational tactic of the privy/privacy structure. If you look at what comes out of the mouth, the organization has always done the right thing, there is no wrong. All the negativities are either caused by someone else or by people who do not do their job properly. It should not be forgotten that the privy/privacy organization is a structure that feeds on darkness. It is in a structure that does not see religious or moral persecution (a means of shame) to resort to all kinds of najis, deceiving matters from their essence, putting a veil over them and only showing the side it wants to Show itself.
If you ask the incorrigible defenders of the organization, the organization is a white spoon out of milk, and whatever happened in the country, Ahmet, Mehmet, Ali or Veli have always kept them alive, but they have not been involved in any mischief. We have no words to say about these, leaving them to drown in their own darkness, but trying to prevent others from imprisoning them in these darkness will be the best way and method. Yes, it is necessary to extend a hand to our citizens who have haphazardly got into this business and are looking for a branch to hold around today, when the motto is “to let people live so that the state can live”. We think that our state has more than enough power and acumen to turn darkness into light and save its citizens from the gloom of this darkness.